|
As
I am not presenting this book as a work of scholarly research,
but rather in the nature of a connected series of essays suggesting
some new perspectives and their consequences, I have chosen not
to insert numerical reference citations in the main text. As I
do draw extensively on a range of books, and particularly upon
several works I consider to be foundational to the Anglosphere
idea, I have chosen to use the collective reference approach.
This section is therefore divided into a "general source
works" section, presenting and commenting upon the works
whose relevance applies throughout the book, followed by a chapter-by-chapter
reference, relating various points and arguments to works of particular
relevance to that section.
GENERAL SOURCE WORKS ON THE ANGLOSPHERE QUESTION
The following books are among the principal works
of scholarship and thought on which I have drawn in proposing
the idea of the Anglosphere perspective; their influence underlies
the entire book. My describing them as "General Source Works
on the Anglosphere Question" indicates their importance to
my thinking, rather than implying that their authors endorse or
agree with the arguments of this work in part or in full, credit
or blame for which is entirely mine.
David
Hackett Fischer’s work Albion’s
Seed: Four British Folkways in North America presents
an effective challenge to one of the central myths of American
exceptionalism: the Turner’s frontier thesis. He argues convincingly
that American culture exhibits great continuity from the British
Isles to the New World, and that differences between American
regional cultures are overwhelmingly the product of the differences
between regional cultures of the British Isles. Turner’s theories
of a transformation through the frontier experience is effectively
disproved, particularly in light of a continual evolution of the
Anglosphere cultures through ongoing frontier experiences within
the British ideas and subsequently.
Fischer’s picture of Anglosphere continuity is consistent
with the Anglosphere exceptionalism whose English roots are shown
by Macfarlane to be deep, and whose overall characteristics are
shown by Véliz to be wide and distinct when viewed through a comparative
lens. Together, they add up to an Anglosphere culture that is
persistent and pervasive over many generations, distinct throughout
its history from other European-origin civilizations around it,
and bearing for its time a particularly strong variety of civil
society.
Francis Fukuyama’s Trust:
The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (New
York, Free Press, 1995) is an excellent book for thinking about,
and comparing and contrasting cultures and subcultures, and particularly
about the role of high trust in successful civil societies. It
builds on previous scholarly work of a more academic nature, most
particularly Edward Banfield’s The Moral
Basis of a Backward Society, and the
subsequent discussions of social trust, in a broader and more
accessible manner.
Alan
Macfarlane’s work, primarily The
Origins of English Individualism (Oxford,
Basil Blackwell, 1978) is certainly one of the critical foundations
underlying modern Anglosphere thought. It refutes in detail the
prevailing Marxist assumption that England had been just another
European peasant society before the modern era and the Industrial
Revolution. Macfarlane makes a strong case for the distinctness
of English-speaking civilization and its unique social mode reaching
back to at least the fifteenth century, and possibly well before.
This stands much Marxist and other economic determinist thinking
on its head. Rather than a product of the Industrial Revolution,
Anglosphere individualism may have been one of the leading causes
of it.
Although
English
Individualism is a highly academic study
(written in a dense academic style) that concentrates primarily
on land tenure in medieval England, its implications, like those
of Fisher’s, are profound and have gone remarkably unnoticed in
many circles that should be aware of them. Macfarlane’s concluding
chapter, in which he speculates on wider implications and possibilities,
is an invitation to further Anglospherist scholarship that has
been largely unexploited to date by thinkers other than Macfarlane
himself.
Among
Macfarlane’s other works, Marriage
and Love in England: Modes of Reproduction 1300–1840 (Oxford,
Basil Blackwell, 1986), is also of interest to the question of
English, and by extension Anglosphere exceptionalism. Just as
Macfarlane’s work on land tenure suggests that English individualistic
family patterns predated (and have contributed to the origin of)
the Industrial Revolution, so Marriage
and Love suggests that English mores
on the status of women gave sex far more value outside of the
role of motherhood far earlier than Continental cultures. Similarly,
the view of marriage as primarily a contract between individuals
rather than as a sacrament, or as a contract between families,
is usually thought of as a result of the Protestant Reformation
and Calvinism in particular. Macfarlane points out English law
long predating the Reformation that treats marriage as an individualistic
contract and, in contrast to Roman-derived Continental law, denies
either a Church or a family veto on the right to marry.
Subsequent
to the writing of the text of this work, Macfarlane’s The
Riddle of the Modern World became available.
This is an extended discussion of what Ernest Gellner calls "the
conditions of the Exit"—specifically, the exit from the cycle
of the rise and fall of bureaucratic authoritarian empires caused
by the linked phenomena of the Scientific-Technological and Democratic
Revolutions. Written in the form of a discussion of four critical
thinkers on this topic—Montesquieu, Adam Smith, Tocqueville, and
Gellner—it goes into much greater detail on some of the interesting
questions raised in English Individualism
and serves as further substantiation
of the general issue of Anglosphere exceptionalism.
It
is also worth noting that Macfarlane and the authors he discusses
in The
Riddle of the Modern World properly
place the emergence of the Anglosphere’s complex social system
built around individualism in the wider context of the emergence
of individualism in the West in general, a process that extends
at least as far back as ancient Greek civilization. A particularly
useful reference on the early emergence of individualism in consciousness
is found in The Marvellous Century: Archaic
Man and the Awakening of Reason, by
George Woodcock (New York, W. W. Norton, 2000).
Kevin
Phillips has written in The
Cousins’ Wars: Religion, Politics, and the Triumph of Anglo-America
(Basic Books) an excellent, comprehensive,
and accessible treatment of the three principal internal conflicts
of the Anglosphere—the English Civil War, the American Revolution,
and the American Civil War. Phillips mentions the prospect for
closer Anglo-American collaboration at the end of the book, but
he fails to elaborate.
He
is also not conversant with the issues of the Information Economy
and the next likely phases of the Scientific-Industrial Revolution,
and is therefore unduly pessimistic about the Anglosphere’s future.
He sees the
fact
that the Anglosphere is further into the transition than the rest
of the world as a weakness (because of the decline of traditional
Industrial Age manufacturing) than as a strength. This is like
fearing (in, say, 1860) that the transition from sailing to steamships
was going to doom British and American naval power because their
advantages in timber-framing and sailmaking were fading.
Claudio
Véliz, in The
New World of the Gothic Fox: Culture and Economy in English and
Spanish America (University of California
Press, 1994) approaches the Anglosphere question from a comparative
viewpoint, quite successfully. It would not be excessive to say
that Véliz is to today’s emerging Anglosphere what Tocqueville
was to nineteenth-century America, the perceptive outsider who
sees the forest where natives see only trees. His book is an extremely
erudite and impressive survey of the contrasting natures of the
"Gothic Foxes" of the Anglosphere and the "Baroque
Hedgehogs" of the Hispanosphere. Professor Véliz, a Chilean
who has lived much of his life in Australia, England, and America,
knows both spheres intimately.
Samuel
Huntington, The
Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New
York, Touchstone, 1996) is the canonical book on the "civilizational"
analysis of the world political structure. He discusses briefly
the idea of an English-speaking alliance as a civilizational-based
unit, although without including the nations of the British Isles.
Some
new books appear: Ezra Vogel’s Japan
as Number One and Herman Kahn’s The
Emerging Japanese Superstate began this
trend; Jean-Jacques Servant-Schreiber’s The
American Challenge (Simon and Schuster,
1979) was the European equivalent, with America as the foreign
challenger.
Thinking about the Revolutions of the Singularity
five
revolutions: Some interesting books
describing possible Singularity breakthroughs include the work
of K. Eric Drexler (Engines of Creation,
Nanosystems, and Unbounding
the Future, the later coauthored by
Christine Peterson and Gayle Pergamit) and Robert A. Freitas’s
Nanomedicine, Volume 1: Basic Capabilities
(Landes Bioscience, 1999). Less radical
but still transformative visions include such works as Elizabeth
McCaughey Ross’s discussion of nongenetic medical advances in
American Outlook (Spring
2000). A wild card, but again a potentially transformative one
is Thomas Gold’s The Deep Hot Biosphere
(New York, Springer-Verlag, 1999), which
deals with the possibility of a biogenic origin of petroleum.
Bounded
and Unbounded Problems: The Space Development Example
history of space exploration: I
covered some of these topics in Privatizing
Space Transportation (Bennett, James
C., and Salin, Phillip K., Reason Foundation, Los Angeles, 1987)
and more recently in the Hudson Institue’s 2020 Forecast. For
the story of America’s early work on space transportation, see
Project RAND, Preliminary Design of an
Experimental World-Circling Space Ship,
Report SM-11827, Douglas Aircraft Corporation, May 2, 1946, and
especially the long-classified Feed Back
Summary Report (Lipp, J. E., and Salter,
R. M., eds. Project)
Contract No. AF 33(038)-6413, The Rand Corporation, March 1, 1954).
I am particularly indebted to the former chairman of the board
of directors of American Rocket Company, Stuart Kreiger, for pointing
out the importance of the latter document. He should know; he
had been the team leader on Project Feedback.
Y2K as the Opposite Case: Mistaking Bounded for Unbounded Problems
my
column in Strategic Investment The
column appeared quarterly between 1995 and 2000, in Strategic
Investment newsletter, Baltimore, Agora
Publishing.
Civil Society and the Hazards of the Singularity Revolutions: The Case of Nanotechnology
a
long, pessimistic essay William Joy
in Wired magazine,
March 2000.
Civil Societies and the Economy of the Singularity
peaceful
states are peaceful because of the strength of their civic statehood
The "democratic argument against
war"—that that democracies do not start wars against democracies—goes
back at least to Kant. Once examined, this rapidly becomes an
exercise in taxonomy. Is it valid, for example, to call Britain
in 1914 a democracy, and Germany not? The case for, more precisely,
strong civil societies not warring on each other is strengthened
by Spencer R. Weart’s Never at War: Why
Democracies Will Not Fight One Another (New
Haven, Connecticut, Yale University Press, 1998). This is an important
piece of research into the historical case for the "democratic
argument against war." His distinctions among democracies,
autocracies, and oligarchies, and research into their historical
implications, is an original refinement of that argument. He mentions
but does not elaborate on the fact that democracies tend to form
"permanent leagues" with each other, which become important
actors in international relations. Network commonwealths as I
have defined them could be considered one form of such "permanent
leagues."
Hobbes and Rousseau in Cyberspace
a
few rich Singapores and many poor, conflict-torn Kosovos See
for instance the various speculations of Thomas L. Friedman, whose
The Lexus and the Olive Tree (New
York, Anchor Books, 2000) offers a recent treatment of globalization
(symbolized by the Lexus) versus cohesion of local cultures (symbolized
by the olive tree) by a reasonably pro-globalization author. He
has some strange quirks, however, such as seeing the European
Union in its current incarnation as a pro-globalization force,
rather than a quixotic attempt to graft all the little "olive
trees" of Europe into one big, harmonized Euro-Olive-Tree
which can then stand up to the Lexus. Contrast Robert Kaplan,
whose An Empire Wilderness: Travels Into
America’s Future (New York, Random House,
1998) sees much of what is happening in the decentralization of
America and the descent of the rest of the world into anarchy.
Georgie
Anne Geyer’s Americans
No More: The Death of Citizenship (New
York, Atlantic Monthly Press, 1996) is another regretful look
at the waning of the economic state. Like Kaplan, Geyer sees the
decline of the United States as a centralized nation-state, and
the loss of coherence at the federal level. Although she has an
acute understanding of the role of multiculturalist ideology in
contributing to this decline, she fails to see the stronger economic
pressures, which also undercut the coherence of the current American
national state. Kaplan is more aware of the fact that the unity
and coherence of the American state is a relatively transitory
episode, "from (T.) Roosevelt to (F. D.) Roosevelt,"
and in decentralizing, America is returning to its more normal
state of being.
Similarly,
Michael Lind’s The
Next American Nation: The New Nationalism and the Fourth American
Revolution (New York, Free Press, 1995)
contains an excellent critique of the current multicultural school
of politics; basically, however, he doesn’t have a clue about
the coming economy. He is a member of the Hold Your Breath and
Stamp Your Feet school of national sovereignists: he feels that
we can revert to the economic and political structure of the Industrial
Era by force of political will, without addressing any of the
real issues of loss of the ability of states to control such transactions.
He mistakes the effect (loss of ability to control economic activities)
for the cause (which he attributes to a lack of desire, or failure
of will).
Other
influential books along this line include William Pfaff’s The
Wrath of Nations: Civilization and the Furies of Nationalism (New
York, Touchstone, 1993) and Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s Pandaemonium:
Ethnicity in International Politics (Oxford
University Press, 1993).
These particularly discuss the issues of nationalism,
decentralization, and devolution.
Three
that have attracted attention on the question of the future of
state institutions include Kenichi Ohmae’s The
End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies (New
York, Free Press, 1996), Jean-Marie Guehenno’s similarly titled
(in the English translation) The End
of the Nation State (University of Minnesota
Press, 1995), and Walter Wriston’s The
Twilight of Sovereignty: How the Information Revolution Is Transforming
Our World (Scribner, 1992).
Lord
David Howell, an economist who served in Margaret Thatcher’s Cabinet,
has written a recent and thoughtful book on some of the same issues.
The Edge of Now: New Questions for Democracy in the Network Age
(Macmillan, 2000) covers many of the
same points as this work, and from a similar perspective.
Of
course one constant source of popular imagery that advances the
picture of the rich Singapore/poor Kosovo future is the "cyberpunk"
school of science fiction. The seminal work is probably Phillip
K. Dick’s
Do Androids Dream of Electronic Sheep?,
which became the source for the film Blade
Runner, which provided much of the standard
imagery of the chaotic future. William Gibson and Bruce Sterling
(Neuromancer,
in 1984, and Schismatrix,
1985, respectively and most notably, and together, The
Difference Engine, 1990) explicitly
generated the cyberpunk school, although Vernor Vinge anticipated
many of its themes in True Names (1977).
Neal Stephenson further refined the genre into the "cypherpunk"
school, named after the nonfiction Cypherpunk
Manifesto of Tim May (private circulation
1991, subsequently widely distributed on the World Wide Web).
See Stephenson’s Snow Crash (1992),
The Diamond Age (1995)
(to my knowledge, the first appearance of the word "Anglosphere"),
and Cryptonomicon
(1999).
Linux as a Foreshadowing of the Economics of the
Singularity
A
new "Theory of the Network" to supplement and update
Ronald Coase’s A Theory of the Firm (1937).
Coase’s brilliant work asked the simple question, "Why have
companies? Why not just have a number of individuals contracting
and cooperating with each other?" His answer, obvious once
the question was asked, was transaction
costs. Having to pay a support person
for every letter typed, having to pay a receptionist for every
call answered, would become impossibly complicated and expensive
in a large cooperative enterprise. But what happens when the relationship
of transaction costs
to scope of effort is substantially altered by technology? For
all the discredited hype of the Internet bubble, the fact remains
that one of the effects of the Internet, and related technologies,
is to change that relationship. We have only started to think
about how that change will play out. This doesn’t disprove Coase’s
fundamental insight in any way, but it does require rethinking
some of the immediate conclusions of his 1937 article.
The Second Gateway wave of deregulation, decontrol,
and privatization and the First and
Third Gateway concepts are discussed at greater length in my article
in American Outlook (Spring
2000).
Historians
such as William McNeill, David Landes, and Thomas Sowell have
been generating what has been called a "macrohistorical"
analysis. William McNeill’s The
Rise of the West is probably the foundational
book of this analysis. The macrohistorical view emphasizes the
emergence of particular entrepreneurial characteristics in Western
civilization as the key to its rise. David S. Landes’s The
Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So
Poor (New York, W. W. Norton, 1998)
is very good on the role of civil society in creating wealth,
although taking a rather static view of free trade issues. Thomas
Sowell’s Conquests and Cultures: An International
History (New York, Basic Books, 1998)
is one of the best and most accessible discussions of the macrohistorical
worldview. His Race and Culture: A World
View (New York, Basic Books, 1994) and
Migrations and Cultures: A World View
(New York, Basic Books, 1996) are useful
discussions of the racial and cultural issues in particular.
The
debate over the relative role of culture in development is hotly
contended in academia. A useful guide to this, with a tilt toward
those who believe culture is a critical element, can be found
in Culture
Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress (New
York, Basic Books, 2000), Lawrence E. Harrison and Samuel P. Huntington,
eds. Note that it is coedited by Samuel Huntington, whose The
Clash of Civilizations is itself a source
of controversy.
Carlo
Cipolla’s Guns,
Sails and Empires: Technological Innovation and European Expansion
1400–1700 (New York, Pantheon Books,
1965) is worth reading for its discussion of the interplay between
technology and cultural-historical development, a critical element
of this type of analysis.
England, because of its position offshore from
the European continent . . . England’s
insular situation is the starting point for almost any discussion
of English (and ultimately Anglosphere) exceptionalism. Paul Johnson’s
The
Offshore Islanders (Phoenix Press, 1998)
is one of the more useful discussions of this point.
Some
historians have begun to deny the criticality of Britain’s insularity.
Felipe Fernandez-Armesto’s Civilizations:
Culture, Ambition, and the Transformation of Nature (Macmillan,
2000) dismisses Johnson and other insularists rather cavalierly.
Fernandez-Armesto discusses a category he has created which he
terms "small-island civilizations" and argues that such
civilizations have certain ecologically driven similarities. He
then makes a rather unsupported leap to dismiss insularity as
a factor in British exceptionalism (and further leaps to dismiss
the validity of British exceptionalism, without any particular
argumentation) because Britain does not fit his category of small-island
civilization. Although he does not articulate it, he seems to
be making an argument that only small islands can enjoy exceptionalism
on account of their insularity.
Yet a very brief consideration of the counterfactual
serves to dismiss Fernandez-Armesto’s dismissal of British insularity
and English exceptionalism. If the Channel were, by geological
quirk, to be shrunk to the width of a fordable river, or eliminated
altogether, it is hard to construct a credible scenario in which
(to construct only the most limited of lists) Phillip of Spain,
any of the various ambitious Louises of France, Napoleon, Hitler,
or Stalin could not have succeeded in invading and subduing England
by land, where in fact they aspired and failed by sea. Either
England would have been just another Netherlands in European politics,
or it would have responded by becoming another France: a fortified,
centralized, militarized state with a strong standing army and
all the political and sociological consequences thereof. Without
admitting an unqualified geographical determinism, it is difficult
to see how Britain’s particular geographical circumstances have
not been a significant factor in its exceptionalism.
Norman
F. Cantor, Imagining
the Law: Common Law and the Foundations of the American Legal
System (New York, HarperCollins, 1997),
is a good historical discussion of the Anglo-American legal system.
Common
law as a significant factor in Anglosphere exceptionalism is neither
sentimental nor imaginary. For example, consider this: "According
to Ira Millstein, a lawyer at Yale’s International Institute for
Corporate Governance, market-based capitalism seems much more
likely to take root in countries with a legal system based on
English common law and with an independent judiciary. It seems
to fare less well in countries with legal systems based on European
civil law, particularly the French version of it. Common law is
more flexible and quicker to adapt to change, provides stronger
investor protection, and is less likely to sanction heavy-handed
state intervention. But it will be difficult for civil-law countries
to move in that direction, says Millstein. ‘You can’t just become
a common-law system overnight.’" (The
Economist, May 18, 2002, A Survey of
International Finance, p. 28.)
a doctrine that survives today in the "Identity
Christianity" movement. Although
"British Israelites" and their contemporary offshoot,
"Identity Christianity," have very long roots in English
religious and political discourse, they have gravitated to a peculiar
corner of the far right today. Howard Bushart, John R. Craig,
and Myra Barnes, Soldiers of God: White
Supremacists and Their Holy War for America (New
York, Kensington Books, 1998) is a good discussion of the Identity
Christianity movement and its relations with neo-Nazis in the
United States.
Joel
Dyer’s Harvest
of Rage: Why Oklahoma City Is Only the Beginning
(New York, Westview Press, 1997) is an informative discussion
of militias, mid-American rage, and the Identity Church movement.
I find it a bit simplistic and deterministic in assigning blame
to particular administration farm policies and underplaying the
genuine cultural divisions between the New York- and Washington-based
cultures and the regional cultures of the Plains and Mountain
West. Additionally, as further information about possible cooperation
between fundamentalist radicals and American white supremacists
emerges, some parts of Dyer’s thesis about the purely American
and right-wing roots of these movements begin to seem less likely.
The Anglosphere and the New Understanding of the
West
Ambivalence
toward the Continental European concept of the nation-state.
Adam Zamoyski’s Holy Madness: Romantics,
Patriots, and Revolutionaries, 1776–1871 (London,
Wiedenfeld and Nicholson, 1999) is a very useful discussion of
the emergence of the respective Anglosphere (although he doesn’t
use the term) and Continental European concepts of the nation
and the nation-state. Interesting is his account of the continual
disillusionment of Continental nationalist radicals who admired
the American Revolution and its supposed nationalism from afar
but who discover the religious-sectarian and mercantile roots
of the American republic on closer inspection. As Conor Cruise
O’Brien observed in his similarly illuminating
The Long Affair: Thomas Jefferson and the French Revolution, 1785–1800
(University of Chicago Press, 1996),
America and France have since the time of their respective revolutions
chosen to enjoy a mesentente cordiale
that inevitably is shattered upon closer
inspection.
What’s
a nation? Nationalism
(John Hutchinson and Anthony D. Smith,
eds., Oxford University Press, 1994) is a useful introduction
to the standard thinking on the nationalism question. John Breuilly’s
Nationalism and the State (University
of Chicago Press, 1982) is another competent review of the nationalism
question from an academic perspective.
What Is the Anglosphere?
Védrine,
in his book Hubert Védrine (Dialogue
avec Dominique Moïsi), Les cartes de
la France à l’heure de la mondialisation (Fayard,
2000).
Cultural Nations and Regions: What’s the Difference?
the
proper definition of a region is part
of a debate including Darrell Dellamaide’s
The New Superregions of Europe (Plume,
1994) and particularly Joel Garreau’s influential The
Nine Nations of North America (Avon,
1981). An interesting and influential discussion, primarily impressionistic
and anecdotal rather than scholarly, that divides North America
into a number of "nations," based on a combination of
economic and cultural factors. Garreau tends to oversimplify and
to overrate economic factors while underrating cultural and historical
factors. Published before Fischer’s magisterial work, he seems
to be unaware of the powerful continuity of the westward cultural
streams originating from the settlement of North America. Despite
these limitations, the book is useful in examining the fact that
regional differences are extremely significant in North America.
Becoming a Self-Aware Civilization: The Anglosphere
Perspective
Memetic,
rather than genetic, identity The idea
of a "meme" as the rough informational equivalent of
a gene in cultural evolution, was first advanced by Dawkins in
The Selfish Gene (Oxford,
1976). Substituting a cultural-evolutionary view of the Anglosphere
for the social-Darwinist Anglo-Saxonism of previous visions is
critical for understanding the phenomenon.
The second vision, that of Cecil Rhodes and Alfred
Milner was promoted in a series of books
and publications and was part of the founding vision of the English-Speaking
Union, which survives today as a cultural organization. It was
also the driving motivation behind the establishment of the Rhodes
Scholarships. Insight into Rhodes’s concept, highly racial, Anglo-Saxonist,
and imperialist, is disclosed in his remarkable Confession
of Faith (1877). A less social-Darwinist
version of the second vision is found in works of later advocates
such as George Catlin in works like
Anglo-Saxony. Perhaps the last serious
advocate of the second vision was James Burnham, who in The
Struggle for the World (1947) advocated
a union
between the United States and the British Empire as part of a
program for containing and defeating the Soviet Union. Perhaps
the most lasting influence of Burnham’s book was its impact on
the thinking of George Orwell. Orwell’s vision in his Nineteen
Eighty-Four (1949) was of the division
of the world into three contending totalitarian states, one of
which, Oceania, was based on the English-speaking world and its
dependencies. Orwell’s geopolitical vision, represented by the
political tract attributed to "Emmanuel Goldstein" in
the novel, was drawn almost entirely from Burnham’s work.
Churchill’s History of
the English-Speaking Peoples. A
History of the English-Speaking Peoples (London, Cassell and Company,
1956–1958).
The Three Memetic Plagues of the Anglosphere
Archbishop
Wulfstan quoted in Oxford
History of England, Kenneth O. Morgan,
ed. (Oxford University Press, 1984).
extended hot-and-cold war that lasted for the entirety
of Elizabeth I’s reign Anglo-America
must properly be seen as an Elizabethan enterprise rather than
a Jacobean one, even though permanent formal settlement in the
territory of the future United States was not finally accomplished
until after Elizabeth’s death. A case could be made that Americans
still exhibit more Elizabethan virtues and vices than were retained
in England itself. Certainly the context of the settlement enterprise
was part and parcel of the ongoing conflict with Spain and the
Counter-Reformation. A useful discussion of the Elizabethan roots
of both the Roanoke and Jamestown colonies is found in Giles Milton’s
Big Chief Elizabeth: How England’s Adventurers
Gambled and Won the New World (London,
Hodder and Stoughton, 2000). This is a popular account of the
first century of the Anglosphere’s extension into North America,
with particular regard to the political context of the founding
and possible sabotage of the Roanoke colony within Elizabethan
court politics.
The South Carolina planters described by William
W. Freehling The Road to Disunion:
Secessionists at Bay, 1776–1854 (Oxford
University Press, 1990). Freehling’s work is an excellent, very
thorough treatment of the run-up to the American Civil War, with
particular emphasis on the demographics and economics of slavery
and gradual emancipation in the prewar period. It argues powerfully
that the ending of the U.S. slave trade in 1808, a result of the
compromises needed to create the Constitution, was the beginning
of the end of slavery in America, and that the secessionist movement
was driven by South Carolina’s desperate endgame need
to reopen the trade or conquer other slave-bearing territories
in Latin America.
Brazil, the great slave destination of the New
World See particularly Hugh Thomas’s
The Slave Trade: The Story of the Atlantic
Slave Trade: 1440–1870 (New York, Touchstone,
1997). A very comprehensive history of the Atlantic slave trade,
particularly useful for putting the Anglosphere role in the slave
trade in the wider perspective—of the 11,328,000 African slaves
carried in the Atlantic slave trade, only 500,000 were landed
in what is now the United States; by far the largest destination
was Brazil, where 4,000,000 landed.
The Gunpowder Plot (1605) brought all these issues
to the fore See particularly Lady Antonia
Fraser’s Faith and Treason: The Story
of the Gunpowder Plot (1997). Neither
a "Popish Plot" directed from Rome, nor a useful figment
of Protestant imagination, as respective partisans have charged,
the Gunpowder Plot now seems to have been blowback from the shadowy
intelligence underworld of the Anglo-Spanish cold war of Elizabethan
times. Fraser’s work incorporates substantial new evidence in
this story of alienated military-veteran drifters with eerie premonitions
of later events. I am indebted to Garry Wills’s Witches
and Jesuits: Shakespeare’s Macbeth
(Oxford University Press, 1995) for the ingenious and instructive
device of imagining the circumstances of the Gunpowder Plot in
the context of the political environment of 1950, with the Communists
in the role of the Catholics. This device is a useful point of
departure for further thinking about the continuity of Anglosphere
attitudes about conspiracy.
Coming Home to the Anglosphere
The
Iberian slave civilizations of the New World and
their interaction with Anglosphere plantation practice, primarily
in the Caribbean but also in Barbados-settled South Carolina and
the Deep South Dixie states, are discussed in Thomas’s Slave
Trade and also in Peter Linebaugh’s
and Marcus Rediker’s The Many-Headed
Hydra: Sailors, Slaves, Commoners, and the Hidden History of the
Revolutionary Atlantic (Beacon, 2001).
Although I use the term Iberian because
New World slavery was primarily a Portuguese phenomenon, Anglosphere
slavery was most directly influenced by Spanish practice rather
than Portuguese. By terming Iberian civilizations "slave
civilizations," I am emphasizing the fact that slavery was
a practice embedded in and integral to Roman law (as Tocqueville
observed, "Roman law is slave law") and that the Spanish
and Portuguese imperial civilizations were organic continuations
of Roman civilization. In English Common Law, on the other hand,
slavery and slave codes were grafted on by colonial statute. This
did not necessarily make the life of the slave in the Anglosphere
any better; in fact, it led to the doctrine of the slave as chattel,
rather than as a human being with some rights, however limited.
However, it made abolition of slavery as a whole the eventual
focus of moral thinking, rather than melioration of the slave’s
lot, as in Spanish and Portuguese thought.
Hydra is an interesting
work as part of the "Atlantic system" approach. By focusing
on the underclasses usually ignored in older triumphalist histories,
it shows the development of a memetic Anglosphere encompassing
the British Isles, the English Caribbean, English North America,
and English outposts in Africa very early on in the history of
settlement. This Anglosphere, of course, communicated in the medium
of an English-based Creole language and reflected Anglosphere
working-class culture rather than upper- or middle-class culture.
However, it anticipated and paved the way for the later broad
multiclass Anglosphere later formed by mass emigration.
Theorists such as Oswald Spengler Arthur
Herman’s The Idea of Decline in Western
History (New York, Free Press, 1997)
provides a useful history of declinism as an ideological strain,
including relatively little-known chapters of that history such
as the Spenglerian basis of the thought of W. E. B. DuBois, and
therefore of much African-American contemporary thought.
The concept of Western civilization was prolonged
Gress’s From
Plato to NATO: The Idea of the West and Its Opponents (New
York, Free Press, 1998) provides an excellent review of the narratives
about the West, favorable and otherwise.
By the year 1200 slavery was nearly extinct in
England Oxford History of Britain.
Of the 11 million slaves Thomas,
Slave Trade.
Thomas’s statistics on slaves landed by the Atlantic
slave trade give the following breakdown by destination:
Brazil
4,000,000
Spanish empire (including Cuba) 2,500,000
British West Indies 2,000,000
French West Indies 1,600,000
British North America/U.S. 500,000
Dutch West Indies 500,000
Europe (including Canaries, Madeira, etc.) 200,000
Total
11,328,000
These statistics are significant not as an exercise
in proportioning moral blame (which of course they do not) but
in illustrating the point that the Atlantic slave trade was in
Spanish and Portuguese America an organic extension of the classical
Mediterranean pattern of slavery and slave-worked latifundia,
but an alien graft onto an Anglosphere that, like Northwestern
Europe in general, had left slavery behind in the early Middle
Ages. As Tocqueville wrote, "Roman law . . . is slave law."
Slave codes and black codes governing freedmen always rested uneasily
within Common Law.
Free black men who were property holders were not deprived of
the vote in Virginia This story, along
with an interesting set of discussions about the gradualness of
development of racial chattel slavery in the Chesapeake in the
seventeenth century, can be found in Scott L. Malcolmson’s
One Drop of Blood: The American Misadventure of Race (New
York, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2000.) This is an interesting
narrative of white-black-Indian relations in America, including
the interesting story of the gradual Africanization of Cherokee
slavery (and the conclusion that slavery is more intrinsically
compatible with a collective culture than an individualistic one)
and the somewhat different experiences of slaves in Cherokee culture.
The book’s usefulness, however, is somewhat limited by the author’s
overgeneralization from his own experiences.
Sir Francis Drake . . . developed a plan to "roll
back" the Spanish Empire This
fascinating story is related in Ronald Sanders’s Lost
Tribes and Promised Lands: The Origins of American Racism (New
York, HarperCollins, 1978). In addition, Sanders provides much
interesting information about the key years between 1500 and 1700
as the English-speaking world attempted to deal with the phenomenon
of racially based slavery and colonization of lands inhabited
by other races.
not as an inherent part of English-speaking civilization
David Horowitz,
Hating Whitey and Other Progressive Causes (Dallas,
Spence Publishing Company, 1999) discusses racial guilt as an
aspect of political correctness, and its fruits in contemporary
America from the perspective of a reformed practitioner of the
art. An ironic side note about the propagation of the Anglosphere
guilt narrative can be found in Tony Horwitz’s Blue
Latitudes (Henry Holt & Co., 2002)
in which he traces the source of much of the negative picture
of Captain James Cook and his explorations in the Pacific. That
source, as related by Horwitz, was deliberate denigration of Cook’s
record by New England missionaries in early Hawaii, who wished
to spread ill-will toward Britain as a result of competition with
British missionaries.
An indigenous Anglosphere ideology, abolitionism
See Fischer, Albion’s
Seed, on the role of the Quakers in
England and America, and Many-Headed
Hydra
for the broader context of English religious radicalism of
the English Civil War era and its relation to abolition of slavery
and other, now generally accepted, modern attitudes.
Quaker culture . . . was also the source . . .
of most of the principles see again
Fischer, Albion’s Seed,
on the Quakers. When calculating when women gained the franchise
in the Anglosphere, the beginning of the process was not 1879
in Wyoming, or 1920 nationwide in the United States. One must
begin with the institution of parallel men’s and women’s meetings
in the Quaker congregations of seventeenth-century England, which
had to reach consensus internally and mutually before a decision
could be recorded.
Third-rate Spenglerist narrative See
again Herman’s The Idea of Decline in
Western History
as Robert Conquest observed Conquest’s
Reflections on a Ravaged Century
(New York, W. W. Norton, 2000), although primarily a reflection
on the totalitarian ravages of the twentieth century (which Conquest
called by name long before other, more fashionable intellectuals
had to eventually admit he was right) contains a useful discussion
of the history of the British Empire and its transformation into
Commonwealth, in the context of which his observation on the fallacy
of equating the transformation of the British Empire with the
Gibbonesque concept of a fall of Rome is made. It also contains
an excellent analytical chapter on the European Union and a following
chapter advocating some form of Anglosphere alliance as an alternative
to other forms of world organization. Conquest’s history of intellectual
courage, and his status as one of the first contemporaries to
call for an Anglosphere alliance, surely should earn him the distinction
of a Wise Elder of the Anglosphere.
Also
worth reading on the question is David Cannadine’s Ornamentalism:
How the British Saw Their Empire (Penguin
Books, 2001). This is another attempt to break new ground in the
examination of Britain’s Second Empire and Commonwealth experience.
Rather than seeing the imperial project primarily in economic
determinist terms as a fundamentally exploitative venture, Cannadine
makes a well-argued case that the Second Empire was primarily
an attempt at recreating overseas the values and social positions
of the landed aristocracy that were fading at home under the impact
of the Industrial Revolution. This gives further impetus to the
examination of the paradox of a society that, at home, gave free
rein to what Drucker termed the creative destruction of the market
economy, while abroad allied itself with the traditional princes
against exactly the same sort of middle-class entrepreneurs from
which it drew its wealth and power at home. This paradox in particular
laid the roots of revolt against the empire in India, Egypt, Iraq,
and the more developed parts of Africa, while maintaining Britain’s
position in less-developed countries like Jordan or the Persian
Gulf emirates.
proposals
like that of author Clarence Streit who
was an influential proponent of a federal union of the democracies
in books such as Union Now: The Proposal
for Inter-Democracy Federal Union (New
York, Harper, 1940). Ironically, Streit’s work was an evolution
from the work of the turn-of-the- century Anglo-Saxonists like
Milner and Catlin. This evolution took the form of expanding from
a concept of a core union between the United States and the British
Empire, to gradually including other Western democracies, to ultimately
including non-Western, nondemocratic states, the latter vision
eventually resulting in the United Nations. Another variant excluded
the United States from the vision and eventually led to the European
Union. This evolution was partly the result of the gradual discrediting
of the exceptionalism of the original Anglo-Saxonists, under the
pressure of an economic-determinist view of the Industrial Revolution
and emergence of constitutional democracy. Today Anglospherist
approaches critique world federalism on the basis of a new generation
of scholarship that revindicates the Anglosphere exceptionalism
in understanding these phenomena, and again ironically now counterposes
Anglospherist concepts of cooperation to world-federalist and
pan-Europeanist derivatives of originally Anglo-Saxonist schools
of thought.
Proposal to create a free trade agreement between
NAFTA and the European Union by Gordon
Brown as reported in the Christian Science
Monitor, July 27, 2001.
One World through the Internet?
Gateways
through which a society must pass This
approach was discussed by the author at greater length in American
Outlook (Spring 2000).
Trust and Civil Society
the
characteristic of trust See again Fukuyama’s
Trust and Harrison
and Huntington’s Culture Matters.
Hanseatic Leagues in Cyberspace
The
German Hanse See particularly Philippe
Dollinger, The German Hansa (Palo
Alto, Stanford University Press, 1970).
The
New Understanding of the Market: Rules of Thumb for Intervention
works of Ludwig von Mises and Hayek Particularly
for these points The Austrian Theory
of the Trade Cycle and Other Essays—by
Ludwig von Mises et al. (Ludwig Von Mises Institute, 2nd edition,
1996), and The Fatal Conceit: The Errors
of Socialism (collected works of F.
A. Hayek, Vol. 1) by Friedrich A. Hayek and W. W. Bartley, eds
(University of Chicago Press, university edition, 1989).
The Anarcho-Capitalist Debate and Other Red Herrings
anarcho-capitalism
A good general introduction to this
school of thought would be The Machinery
of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism
by David D. Friedman (Open Court Publishing Company, 2nd edition,
1989).
techno-liberals include
Paulina Borsook, author of the amusing but not very deep Cyberselfish:
A Critical Romp through the Terribly Libertarian Culture of High
Tech (Public Affairs, 2001), which is
fairly typical of technoliberal critiques of technolibertarians.
She and others like David Brin point out that the technology libertarians
see as liberatory often has roots in government projects. Well,
yes, and Columbus’s voyages had roots in a mystical interpretation
of the Book of Esdras. Actions often have unintended consequences.
Space
and Power: Geopolitics and the Topology of Information Space
cultural
rather than biological evolution Richard
Dawkins’s The Selfish Gene (Oxford
University Press, 1990) is the originator of the concept of the
meme as the cultural-evolutionary analogue to the gene. It is
critical to understand the ways in which cultural evolution differs
from its biological counterpart.
The Sinews of the Network Commonwealth
The
United Kingdom has tended to get the worst of the deal See
especially Derek Wood’s Project Cancelled:
The Disaster of Britain’s Abandoned Aircraft Projects (Janes,
1986).
Trade,
Defense, and Technology Intersect
Continental militaries have not . . . kept up this
pace See for example David C. Gompert,
Richard L. Kugler, and Martin C. Libicki, Mind
the Gap: Promoting a Transatlantic Revolution in Military Affairs
(Washington, D.C., National Defense
University Press, 1999); and James A. Thompson’s "How a Militarily
Strong Europe Could Help Build a True Partnership," in The
RAND Review (Spring 1999). Thompson’s
article is particularly interesting in that he diagnoses transatlantic
capabilities gaps, notes the British exception to European lagging,
but concludes that the answer is urging the Continentals to close
the gap. The alternative path, recognizing the gap but realigning
organizational structures to adapt to the fact, is never discussed.
Commonwealth or Tribalism
a
narrowly defined tribe Again, Kaplan’s
An Empire Wilderness, Geyer’s
Americans No More, Pfaff’s
The Wrath of Nations, and
Moynihan’s Pandaemonium
are useful discussions of this trend. The work of Scottish nationalist
and culturally homogenous state cheerleader Tom Nairn stands in
contrast, particularly his Faces of Nationalism:
Janus Revisited (New York, Verso, 1997).
Written from a Scottish socialist and nationalist perspective,
Nairn has interesting insights into the nature of nationalism
and the future of the United Kingdom. Unfortunately, his Marxist
perspective and lack of understanding of the emerging economy
undercut the usefulness of his judgments. As a Scottish Marxist
nationalist, he actually regrets the principal advantage Scotland
has enjoyed, which was the absence of a court culture after 1707,
which permitted a particularly rich civil society to spring up
in that country. Although much of what he says about the small
nation-state would be valid when talking about what I term a civic
state, he grossly underestimates the amount of coherence (which
as a Marxist he believes is generated through economics) needed
to make a working civic state in a weak civil society.
Network Commonwealths around the World
The
pension liability issue . . . suggests that the European Union
For a timely and careful analysis of
the European structural crisis, see Patrick Minford’s Should
Britain Join the Euro? (London, Institute
of Economic Affairs, 2002).
as the Chinese diaspora forms a worldwide business
community This story, and the parallel
stories of other ethnic diasporas and the networks
they
form, is given in Joel Kotkin’s Tribes:
How Race, Religion and Identity Determine Success in the New Global
Economy (New York, Random House, 1992).
Kotkin discusses the relevance of emerging global, ethnolinguistic
networks to the Information Economy. He mentions the English-speaking
people, and subgroups within them, as the potential basis for
new "tribes." Some interesting parallels with the Indian
diaspora are discussed in Gurchuran Das’s India
Unbound: The Social and Economic Revolution from Independence
to the Global Information Age (Anchor
Books, 2002). For a wider study of the diaspora question today,
see also Nicholas Van Hear’s New Diasporas:
The Mass Exodus, Dispersal, and Regrouping of Communities
(Seattle, University of Washington Press, 1998).
claims for the resurgence of Confucianism See
William J. F. Jenner, The Tyranny of
History: The Roots of China’s Crisis, for
an insightful picture of China at the end of its Communist phase,
and a much-needed historical look at Confucianism in practice,
as opposed to the imagined Confucianism of Lee Kwan Yew and other
successful de facto Anglo-Confucianists.
fact of interest about Japan Readers
competent in Japanese may find the author’s chapter on Japan and
the Singularity in a recently published volume in that language
to be an interesting further elaboration on these themes. (Not
published in English.) James C. Bennett, Tokuiten
kakumei ni chokumensuru Nihon (The Singularity
Revolution Will Come to Japan) in Chotaikoku
Nihon wa kanarazu yomigaeru (The ReEmerging
Japanese Superstate in the Twenty-first Century), I. Herbert,
ed., London, ed., Tokuma-shoten, Tokyo, 2002.
the
Anglosphere legal tradition of the common law Again,
for a good general discussion of the history of Common Law see
Cantor, Imagining the Law.
American freedom is unambiguously the result of
this constitutional settlement. For
example, see Inventing America: Jefferson’s
Declaration of Independence by Garry
Wills (Mariner Books, 2002).
Jonathan Freedland . . . published the controversial
Bring Home the Revolution:
The Case for a British Republic
(London, Fourth Estate, 1998). An interesting
and controversial discussion of the British roots of America’s
institutions. Freedland demonstrates that the greater openness,
decentralization, constitutional constraints, and popular sovereignty
of the American system
have created the results that many critics of the current British
system say they want. The subtitle is somewhat misleading, as
the book isn’t about the monarchy very much at all. What he really
is advocating is an end to an unconstrained executive, centralization,
and certain other features of British life. It could better be
subtitled "The Case for a British Limited Government,"
as his goals could just as easily be realized within a monarchical
constitution. He is, however, very good on the subject of the
common Anglo-American political roots, and the fact that most
of the divergence has been a case of America implementing a British
radical agenda.
Unusual constitutional ferment throughout the Anglosphere
For example, see Vernon Bogdanor, Devolution
in the United Kingdom (Oxford University
Press, 1999), a good overview of the devolution process in the
British Isles from a constitutional and historical perspective.
Bogdanor is clear-sighted about the fact that Irish independence
was the first chapter of an ongoing saga, a fact that most commentators
on British devolution fail to treat adequately. Also on the United
Kingdom, see Andrew Marr’s The Day Britain
Died (London, Profile Books, 2000),
a discussion of devolution and the strains on the historical concept
of Britain.
For
Canada’s issues, read Lansing Lamont’s Breakup:
The Coming End of Canada and the Stakes for America (New
York, W. W. Norton, 1994), a good discussion of the constitutional
dilemmas faced by Canada, or The Patriot
Game: Canada and the Canadian Question Revisited,
by Peter Brimelow (Hoover Institute Press, 1987).
See
James A. Aho’s The
Politics of Righteousness: Idaho Christian Patriotism
(Seattle, University of Washington Press, 1990), a reasonably
objective survey of alienated opinion in the Mountain West states
of America, and Jonathan Raban’s Bad
Land, a discussion of the history of
Montana and the economic, political, and cultural roots of the
current alienation from mainstream culture which has found roots
there. Raban is superior in its breadth of observation to Dyer’s
previously cited Harvest of Rage.
Since September 11 and its consequential activities, subsequent
to any of these sources, there has been a bifurcation in the alienated
American Mountain West right. The more moderate majority wing
has become conditionally and critically supportive of the Bush
administration, while the extreme fringe has adopted an antiwar,
pro-Arab stance. The dividing line is fairly congruent with the
preexisting line (described fairly well by Aho) between traditional
constitutionalists and the racist, anti-Semitic fringe with neo-Nazi
influences. The racist fringe tends to attribute the September
11 attacks to a U.S. government–Zionist conspiracy intended to
impose totalitarian rule on the United States, while constitutionalists
focus more on perceived failures of the federal government to
prosecute the war against radical fundamentalists sufficiently
vigorously. Also of interest are suggestions of a connection between
the Oklahoma City bombing and radical fundamentalist groups.
The Anglosphere Constitutional Tradition and War
Linda
Colley’s work Britons: Forging the Nation
1707–1837 (New Haven, Yale University
Press, 1992). This is the story of founding the Grand Union of
the United Kingdom. Very perceptive in understanding the tensions
between the nationalisms of England and Scotland versus the emerging
loyalties to the new Union. Some, like Tom Nairn, see in Colley
a refutation of the concept of British nationhood, because she
details the mechanisms through which the British Grand Union narrative
propagated itself. However, it is not clear that the mechanisms
by which Britain, as such, became something like a nation-state
were much different, except in detail, than the mechanisms by
which England or Scotland had become nations in the first place;
the details are merely more accessible to us for being closer
in time and better documented. Of interest to the military question
for its portrayal of nonelectoral mechanisms for assessing consent
of the population to government measures.
Much of the political effort of the Restoration
Stephen Saunders Webb provides a valuable
perspective (one quite different from the traditional Whig narrative)
in Lord Churchill’s Coup: The Anglo-American
Empire and the Glorious Revolution Reconsidered (New
York, Random House, 1995) and its two companions, The
Governors-General: The English Army and the Definition of the
Empire 1569–1681 and 1676: The End of American Independence.
These together constitute a discussion of the development of the
First British Empire between the Restoration and the Revolution
of 1688. The uniqueness of the Whig settlement (and the degree
to which the Whig settlement continued to retain useful elements
of the Restoration imperial system) and the degree to which that
settlement reflected an inoculation against the absolutist Continental
systems requires an understanding of the restoration system. See
esp. p. 270 of Lord Churchill’s Coup
re: continuity of Glorious Revolution
and American Revolution and Constitution.
George III was compelled to hire Hessians The
point about George III’s need to hire mercenaries from the German
principalities because of lack of English enthusiasm for the war
was made in Phillips’s Cousins’ Wars.
The bias against standing armies was so great See
Charles Messenger, History of the British
Army (Greenwich, Connecticut, Bramley
Books, 1993). A useful history of the evolution of British military
structures.
The
Founding Fathers were keenly aware See
1794: America, Its Army, and the Birth
of a Nation by David R. Palmer (Novato,
California, Presidio Press, 1994). This is an interesting and
useful survey of the military events of 1794 and their critical
role in the final defeat of the British and Indians on U.S. territory,
the formation of the U.S. Army, and the militia versus standing
army controversy.
this tradition [the
American militia system] could effectively be revived
See Gary Hart’s The Minuteman: Restoring
an Army of the People (New York, Free
Press, 1998). A good treatment of the Anglo-American military
system, and a discussion of the prospects for restoring militias
as a major element in the U.S.’s defense posture.
Five Civil Wars: Union and Secession in the Anglosphere
Other
families, such as the French speakers For
an interesting discussion of "spatial" vs. "regime"
composition, using the contrasts of Ireland and Algeria, see Ian
S. Lustick, Unsettled States, Disputed
Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the
West Bank-Gaza (Ithaca, New York, Cornell
University Press, 1993). This framework ultimately draws on Gramsci’s
categories, but appears to be a useful approach that is not dependent
on other more problematic aspects of that Marxist theorist’s work.
A unitary state for all Britain In
this era of romanticization of the nationalisms of the non-English
parts of the British Isles, it is useful to recall that the history
of the isles from early medieval times has fluctuated between
the extreme poles of a unitary state of the archipelago on the
one hand and independence for its constituent parts on the other.
Nor have the existing definitions of the components always been
the current ones. R. R. Davies, in The
First English Empire: Power and Identities in the British Isles
1093–1343 (Oxford University Press,
2000) provides a good recapitulation of ideologies of a united
Britain long preceding Cromwell’s achievement of it. Also of interest,
to show that the line between the "natural" formation
of England and Scotland, and the "synthetic" formation
of Great Britain, is not as clear as nationalist narratives like
to present, is his discussion of a five-nation model of British
Isles nationality as an alternative that nearly happened, with
Galloway and the Western Isles as a fifth potential nation separate
in identity from Scotland. The book also gives a fascinating look
at what might be called the first Anglosphere—the extension of
English-speaking populations and social institutions beyond the
boundaries of England into Scotland, Ireland, and Wales in the
twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and their eventual melding with
the local populations to form what
now are the recognized nations of the British Isles. Also of interest
is John L. Roberts, Lost
Kingdoms: Celtic Scotland and the Middle Ages (Edinburgh
University Press, 1997). As he depicts events, Scotland was a
Celtic nation, a mixture of the Brythonic Picts and the Goidelic
Celts, with heavy Viking influence. It was never conquered by
England. How did it become an English-speaking nation? This book
is a good discussion of the question.
Simultaneously a war of secession, a civil war,
. . . and a social revolution
In
addition to Phillips’s extensive discussion of this aspect in
Cousins’
Wars, it is interesting to read Mark
Perry’s Conceived in Liberty: Joshua
Chamberlain, William Oates, and the American Civil War (New
York, Penguin, 1997). Perry provides a useful discussion of the
events before and after the American Civil War from the perspective
of two important figures, North and South. It is most interesting
to watch the changing perceptions during the prewar period, as
well as the conceptual adjustments made subsequently.
For
the war-within-the-war aspect and the complex nature of the New
Ulster subsecession, see William W. Freehling’s invaluable The
South vs. the South: How Anti-Confederate Southerners Shaped the
Course of the Civil War (2001). Consistent
with the cultural-nationalist analysis of the Anglosphere, Freehling
demonstrates how the Confederacy was almost as diverse as the
presecession Union, and that the various cultural nations were
very much at odds with each other. This internal conflict was
one of the major contributors to Confederate defeat.
Of
course, Charles Frazier’s Cold
Mountain (Vintage Books) remains an
excellent fictional treatment of the cultural antagonisms between
the coastal Dixie culture and the New Ulster mountaineers, and
its expression in the struggle between the New Ulster deserters
and draft-dodgers and the pro-Confederate internal patrols that
constituted, in some respects, a Confederate occupation force
in the highlands. Neo-Confederates like to refer to the events
of 1861–1865 as the "War of Northern Aggression"; from
the viewpoint of core New Ulster, it might have been considered
the "War of Southern Aggression against the Mountaineers."
Preserving the National Voice in a Decentralized
World
Author
Jonathan Freedland has contrasted Bring
Home the Revolution
American Cultural Nations and Their Histories
the cultural nations of America Fischer’s
Albion’s Seed,
of course, is the primary source of the cultural-national analysis
of American regionalism as derived from regionalism of the British
Isles; Phillips’s Cousins’ Wars provides
a particularly useful view of American history from this perspective.
A
frequently quoted popular work dividing North America on an (almost)
strictly geographical basis is The
Nine Nations of North America by Joel
Garreau (Avon, 1981). A useful text from a traditional academic
viewpoint is F. M. Shelley, J. C. Archer, F. M. Davidson, S. D.
Brunn, Political Geography of the United
States (New York, Guilford Press, 1996).
Jay
Winik’s April
1865: The Month That Saved America (Perennial,
2001) contains a good discussion of the coherence issues in the
early republic, and the substantial cultural, economic, and political
differences among the states. He also has a useful discussion
of the many secessionist episodes and threats between 1776 and
1865, which were more numerous than generally realized.
Also
of interest is Walter Russell Mead’s Special
Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World
(New York, Knopf, 2001). Mead follows
Fischer’s quadripartite analysis of America in general, but assigns
terminology for the outlook based on archetypal representative
American political figures rather than the cultural-national terminology
used in this work. What is here termed the Midland American pragmatic
and commercial outlook he terms the Hamiltonian
view; the New Ulster (and to a great
extent also the Dixie) view, the Jacksonian;
the greater New England moralistic view, the Wilsonian;
and the relatively isolationist view that sees democracy as an
American system not easily replicated abroad, the Jeffersonian.
(The Jeffersonian view is the only one without an easily assigned
cultural-national analogue; it has some parallels to tidewater
Dixie thought, and some to Midwestern isolationism, which is perhaps
the flip side of Midland pragmatism.)
A rare alignment of the interests This
paragraph is a brief synopsis of the thesis of Phillips’s Cousins’
Wars.
Progressivism can be understood as an alliance
In particular, the rise of the Social
Gospel tendency of Protestant Christianity forged an alliance
between Greater New England and Midland denominations of Protestant
Christianity, fusing the moral purpose of New Englanders with
the pragmatism of Midland Americans. See in particular, Robert
William Fogel’s The Fourth Great Awakening
& The Future of Egalitarianism
(University of Chicago Press, 2000). This book advances the theory
that Social Gospel progressive Christianity was the true underpinning
of the Progressive movement of early twentieth-century America,
and was in itself a "Great Awakening" of religious enthusiasm
equivalent to the first two waves, and the current Fourth Wave
of evangelical Christianity.
A colony in Brazil Dixie’s
colony in Brazil is discussed in Eugene C. Harter’s
The Lost Colony of the Confederacy (University
Press of Mississippi, 1988). A contemporary visit to their descendants,
illuminating the gradual racial intermarriage of the colony, is
included in a rather rambling and anecdotal first-person travel
narrative in Lost White Tribes by
Riccardo Orizio (Avril Bardoni, translator) (New York, Free Press,
2001).
the "Yankee-Cowboy War" in his book of
that title Carl Oglesby, Yankee
and Cowboy War (Berkley, 1977). Written
from a leftist perspective, but one that looked back with something
like nostalgia to the program of the Roosevelt coalition.
The increasing general racial tolerance in America
See Dinesh D’Souza’s
The End of Racism: Principles for a Multiracial Society (Touchstone
Books, 1996), which argues that racism should be viewed not as
the casual dislike of others, or primitive xenophobia, but rather
as a specific early scientific doctrine attempting to explain
human variations; and that this doctrine, and the political ideologies
that it engendered, have largely disappeared from the cultural
mainstream of America (and from that of the Anglosphere in general).
Although this change has not brought perfect intergroup harmony,
it does make possible a primarily cultural, rather than genetic,
understanding of interpersonal and intergroup interactions.
The Relationship between Cultural Nations and Nation-States
The
Trudeau project destroyed See especially
Brimelow’s Patriot Game.
Cultural Nations in Actuality: North America
are
described in Mormon culture by Wallace Stegner Compare
Stegner’s description of a Mormon town circa World War II in Mormon
Country (University of Nebraska Press,
1982) to Fischer’s description of New England characteristics
of ordered liberty in Albion’s Seed.
Stegner is an acute observer of North American regional differences;
his childhood experiences in an American family on a farm in Alberta
presented in Wolf Willow,
for example, are interesting to read as an essay on similarities
and differences between Anglo-Canadians and Greater New Englanders.
the strongest bonds of the Dixie cultural nation
See Tony Horwitz’s Confederates
in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War (Random
House, 1999) for a contemporary account of the persistence of
the Confederate narrative in white Dixie and the antipathy to
it among African Americans.
map out the areas Albion’s
Seed and Freehling’s South
vs. the South both are useful in localizing
these criteria.
Seymour Martin Lipset . . . has devoted a lifetime
of investigation See particularly his
Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions
of the United States and Canada (Routledge,
1990).
1776:
Divergence and the End of the First Empire
Franklin
experimented with constitutional formulas See
H. W. Brands, The First American: The
Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin (Anchor
Books, New York, 2002).
Convergence in Politics: The Dilemma of the Second
Empire
Reading
works like Nevil Shute’s In the Wet (House
of Stratus Inc., 2000; original publication, 1953). Shute’s novel
is set a generation into his future, and depicts a strong, monarchist
Commonwealth that is far more unified than actually occurred,
and still an independent world power on a par with the United
States, but with the center of power shifting from a declining,
depopulating, social democratic Britain to a vigorous Australia
and Canada. He discusses issues that would be relevant in such
a Commonwealth, such as the tension between role of the monarchy
as a Commonwealth unifier, and its functions specific to its role
in the United Kingdom, that have not become acute due to the relative
unimportance of the actual organization. However, such tensions
still continue to arise: e.g., as when the role of Prince Charles
as a spokesman for the British beef industry, which opposed him
to the interests of Australia, became an issue in the 1999 Australian
republic referendum campaign. Shute’s solution, the creation of
an Office of Governor-General for Britain, equalizing its status
relative to the rest of the Commonwealth nations, effectively
would make the institution a Commonwealth monarchy rather than
a British monarchy that is also head of state of some other Commonwealth
nations. It is a solution that may return to view should the monarchy’s
role in nations beyond Britain continue.
Removing the Roadblocks to the Network Commonwealth
The
Falklands War caused a severe internal dispute Sir
John Nott’s Here Today, Gone Tomorrow:
Recollections of an Errant Politician (Politicos
Pub, 2002) contains a frank discussion of the Anglospherist-Hemispherist
controversy in the Reagan administration during the Falklands
War, caused primarily by the fact that the Galtieri regime in
Argentina was one of the key players in the Iran-Contra network
being run by Alexander Haig.
What’s at Stake: Uses of the Network Commonwealth
The
continuing divergence of Britain from the Continent See
for example the discussion in Statecraft:
Strategies for a Changing World by Margaret
Thatcher (HarperCollins, 2002) or again Robert Conquest’s Reflections
on a Ravaged Century.
The idea of a unified Europe built around the "European
Social Model." John Laughland’s
The Tainted Source (Trafalgar
Square, 2000) critiques the Europeanist narrative from a political
and historical viewpoint; Patrick Minford’s Should
Britain Join the Euro: The Chancellor’s Five Tests Examined?
(London, Institute |